I just came across a study that was published earlier this year by George Washington University and Cision on journalists’ use of online and social media in 2009 (PDF). It not only asked about the extent that they used it but also their attitudes towards it.
With my last post featuring some highly regarded journalists’ and publishers’ take on what will happen to print media in the future, I thought these results might be interesting to see…
According to the survey, blogs (64%) are the most frequently used social media tool to publish, promote and distribute what journalists write, followed closely by Social Networking sites such as LinkedIn or Facebook (60%) and Microblogging sites such as Twitter (57%).
When it comes to using social media or online sources for research, most journalists – 56% – said social media is important or somewhat important for reporting and producing the stories they wrote. Of the journalists surveyed, 89% use blogs for online story research, 65% use social media sites such as Facebook and LinkedIn, and 52% use microblogging services such as Twitter. Also, every participant uses Google as a research tool and 61% of journalists use Wikipedia.
Even though it seems journalists are doing a lot of online research, they are skeptical of what they read. Most journalists responded (84%) that they feel news and information delivered via social media was slightly less or much less reliable than news delivered via traditional media – citing lack of fact-checking, verification or reporting standards as the number one reason for this perception.
** Not to toot our own horns, but even with all of the social and online media research they do, the survey reports that journalists still turn to PR professionals for help with their primary research. Among the benefits they cited:
– Ali Smith
Labels: Media Industry, Social Media